|
Issue 6: 2006 BridgeHands Newsletter
Trumps Are Wild, Part 2 |
June-July 2006 |
|
|
|
Dear Bridge Friends,
Welcome to Bridgehands eMag Newsletter, issue 6. In this
issue, we will complete our saga of Marty Bergen's “Trumps are Wild”
from his
Points Schmoints book (nominated “book of the year” by the
ABTA - American Bridge Teachers’ Association). You may call Marty
directly at 800 386-7432 or send EMAIL to him at mbergen@mindspring.com
to place your order for this and other books. Mention Coupon Code
BHB1 when you order any hardbound book and you will receive two
free softbound books!
Next up, the Rule of 3. Working through the numbers, we will learn
how the Rule of 3 gives us a helpful guideline to consider when
competing to win the auction.
Perhaps you have heard the axiom, "Play low in the second seat,
play high in the third seat." Another Rule of 3? (3rd seat) Let's see
where this axiom works and doesn't . . .
Note: Viewing the hands below requires your EMAIL reader to use
"fixed fonts" (not proportional). If you have problems reading this
document, please view our
online web-based copy or
Adobe Acrobat PDF file suitable for printing.
If a friend forwarded you this BridgeHands newsletter, you can
signup here for your own free subscription. |
|
|
Trumps Are Wild! Part 2
Point Schmoints, by Marty Bergen (copyrighted)
Trumps Are Wild, Part 2
Maneuvering Trump Entries Like a Virtuoso
Drawing trumps with a long, solid suit is not difficult, but
neither should it be considered routine. By exercising a bit of
care and effort, you can maintain great flexibility while
pulling trumps:
North
Q J 5 3
South
A K 10 8 6 2
Assume that, as expected, trumps divide 2–1. If you play the
A-K while following low from dummy, you will find
yourself with:
North
Q J
South
10 8 6 2
Very inflexible; there are no entries to the South hand. If,
instead, you cash the Q-J while following low from your
hand, the result will be:
North
5 3
South
A K 10 8
Equally inflexible; now you cannot enter the North hand.
Start again. Take the ace and lead the six to the queen
(among other equivalent solutions). You have preserved:
North
J 5
South
K 10 8 2
You now have two entries to each hand.
You lose nothing with this approach, and you will be a hero
if you need the entries later.
On the following deal, declarer did not appreciate dummy’s
two entries, and paid the price.
North
S 8 7 5 4
H 10 8 6
D 9 6 5
C 7 5 4
West East
S 10 3 S K 9 6 2
H 3 H A 5 4
D K Q J 8 3 D A 7 4 2
C J 9 6 3 2 C Q 10
South
S A Q J
H K Q J 9 7 2
D 10
C A K 8
West North East South
— — 1D Double
3D* P P 4H
All Pass
* Weak jump raise.
West led the DK and continued with the queen. Declarer
ruffed with the H2, but he could no longer make the hand.
When he continued with the HK, East knew enough to duck;
what was his hurry? It was now impossible for declarer to enter
dummy more than once, and one successful spade finesse was not
enough. Declarer eventually lost a spade trick for down one.
Declarer was unlucky to be playing against a capable
defender, but good players make their own luck. If South had
ruffed with an honor instead of the deuce at trick two, he could
have forced two entries to dummy, as follows. Lead the H2
to dummy's six. If East wins his ace, the trump position
would be:
North
H 10 8
West East
H — H 5 4
South
H K Q 9 7
Once declarer is careful to trump East's diamond return with
a second honor, he is in control. Trumping with honors is not
showing off; sometimes it is the only way to preserve entries.
After South ruffs high, he leads the 7 to the 8 and takes the
spade finesse. When that wins, repeat the maneuver; 9 to the 10
for a second spade finesse.
It would not have helped East to duck dummy's 6 on the first
round of trumps. Now the lead would be in dummy, allowing an
immediate spade finesse. The position would then be:
North
H 10 8
West East
H — H A 4
South
H K Q 9 7
This position is virtually the same as above, except for
East's ace. Again, no problem: H7 to the 8
and East's ace; trump the diamond high; and lead
the H9 to dummy's 10 for the second spade finesse.
It is Not Illegal to Count Winners in a Suit Contract
You’ve heard it a thousand times: “In notrump, count winners;
in suit contracts, count losers.” Or, as I like to remind my
students, use the consonants in “win” and “lose” as a memory aid
— Winners in Notrump, Losers in Suit contracts.
However, sometimes it is easier and more helpful to count
winners in a suit contract. This is especially true when
a) the contract is a part-score or slam;
b) the trump suit is shaky; or
c) the hand involves a crossruff.
South could count to ten on this hand.
North
S A K Q
H 7 5 4
D 6 4 3
C 8 5 3 2
West East
S J 9 8 3 S 10
H Q J 10 3 H 9 8 2
D Q 8 D J 10 9 2
C Q 10 6 C K J 9 7 4
South
S 7 6 5 4 2
H A K 6
D A K 7 5
C A
West North East South
P P P 1S
P 2S P 4S
All Pass
Declarer counted eight winners: HA-K, DA-K, CA and SA-K-Q.
If spades divided 3–2, declarer’s last two trumps would be good.
However, good players prefer good technique to good splits and
good luck.
After winning the heart lead, South took his CA. Next,
he cashed the SA-K. Bad split. No problem! He ruffed a
club, and led a third trump. A second club ruff provided
declarer’s seventh trick. DA-K, HK and on to the next
hand.
Copyright, Marty Bergen. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
Rule of 3, Part 1
Having previously covered the
Rule of 1 and
Rule of 2, let’s continue our progression to the
Rule of 3. First off, we should profess that like the Rule
of 1 and 2, this tip is more of a guideline. The Rule of 3
states:
In a competitive auction, often it is best to stop bidding at
the 2 level unless your side has 9+ trumps or a double fit.
Since both sides are bidding competitively, the Rule of 3
assumes both partnerships have roughly the same aggregate
strength (18-22 High Card Points). Thus, aside from
environmental factors, either side has a good chance to win 8
tricks and make their 2 level contract. However, since neither
side has a preponderance of power, the likelihood of making a 3
level contract drops considerably.
So what do we do when the opponents make a two level major
suit bid, perhaps 2 Spades, where we want to compete? According
to the Rule of 3, we should have a superior fit, defined as:
A 9+ card trump suit fit between the two hands, or
A two-suited hand with a fit in partner’s secondary suit (double
fit)
This approach certainly makes sense, since the side that
pushes beyond the 2 level is making a commitment not to lose
more than 4 tricks [ 13 – (6+3) = 4 ]. As we would expect, the
certainty of making a 3 level contract increases appreciably
with an extra strong fit in one or two suits. Some advanced
players consider “The
Law of Total Tricks” and “Losing
Trick Count” for sophisticated hand evaluation. However,
aside from the mathematics of those approaches, their precepts
conform to our Rule of 3.
Incidentally, a corollary to the Rule of 3 states:
“The odd (bidding) level belongs to the opponents.”
This tracks well with our Rule of 3 – compete with the
opponents at the 2 level but use caution at the 3 level. And
when both sides have a very strong fit, consider competing at
the 4 level but not the 5 level (odd level contracts belong to
the opponents). Of course, if it’s clear the opponents’ bidding
is obstructive (perhaps sacrifice bidding), do not let them push
you to an unmakeable contract. If appropriate, increase the
opponents’ penalty by doubling their contract. Conversely, when
the opponents bid 3 Hearts based on strength and your side
overcalls 3 Spades based on length (and perhaps vulnerability),
be aware you are tempting opponents to bid game. If the
opponents bid game, are you prepared to double their game
contract? Probably not if your hand is primarily offensively
oriented - honors in your long suit that are likely to soon be
trumped by opponents. Here again, be careful before making a 3
level bid over the opponents. |
|
|
|
Always play third Hand High? (Rule of 3, Part 2)
In Bridge, there is a axiom that goes, “play low in the second
seat – play high in the third seat.” After an opening lead, the
player in the second seat is in a prime position to become
finessed. By playing low in the second seat, the partner of the
leader (in the third seat) cannot be certain whether the player
in the second or fourth seat holds a crucial honor or
intermediate card; these cards may eventually be promoted to win
a critical trick. However, in third seat, either our partner
deliberately lead the suit or we called for the dummy card as
declarer. Either way, in third seat our predominant goal is to
promote a trick. So we generally play a high card in third seat.
Yet like most “rules”, there are several considerations
before automatically playing a high card in third seat:
1. Play the “lowest of equals” over dummy cards – playing the
higher of two touching honors misleads partner into thinking the
Declarer holds the lower of a touching sequence.
2. When appropriate, keep a “cover card” (usually higher
honor card) over the visible card in dummy – of course, the
defender must carefully consider factors such as transportation,
possible finesses, declarer’s short suits, etc.
3. Avoid winning a trick when gaining the lead at that moment
would ultimately lead to losing additional tricks.
4. Consider keeping suit communications open in Notrump
contract – playing low on the first round (ducking) to
subsequently promote the suit when regaining the lead.
Let’s look at some illustrative examples – this discussion
assumes fourth-best leads.
4 3 2
A 10 9 8 7 K J 5
Q 6
West leads the 10, the top of a sequence. East must go
up with the King, otherwise declarer South will win the
trick and switch to another suit.
K 9 7
A 8 3 2 Q 10 4
J 6 5
West leads the 2, the fourth best and promising a four
card suit (otherwise West would lead a higher card, holding 5).
After declarer plays the 7 from dummy, East must play
Queen, otherwise South unnecessarily wins a cheap trick.
8 7 6
K 10 4 3 Q 9 2
A J 5
West leads the 3, the fourth best - as East, you can
deduce this fact since you hold the 2; if West held 5+
cards, the lead would have been a card above the 3. In
third seat, East must play the Queen, again third hand
high in order to hold the declarer to one winner.
Now let’s look at a few hands involving dummy finesses.
Q 8
A 7 6 5 4 3 K 10 9
J 2
West leads the 5 to dummy’s 8. East must play
the King – third hand high. Incidentally, did you use the
Rule of 11 here? Here the formula is: 11 – 5 = 6
So after the lead of the 5, the remaining 3 hands have 5
cards above the 5. Sitting in the East seat, we can count
5 of the 6 so declarer South has only one card above the
leader’s 5. Playing the King ensures the defenders
get all their tricks. Now let’s modify the hand slightly.
Q 8 2
A 7 6 5 4 K J 9
10 3
After West’s lead of the 5 to dummy’s 8, East
must play the Jack, not the King. This is an example of “low
from equals” – since the dummy’s Queen is pinned, playing
the Jack will win a trick just as effectively as the
King and still keep the looming honor over the Queen
later in the hand. It would be wasteful to play the King
on the first trick and potentially give the opponents an
undeserved trick later in the hand.
Q 8 7
9 2 A J 10 6 5
K 4 3
During the auction East bids a long suit, so West leads the
9 – probably from a doubleton. East may play a low card
since the only outstanding honor above the leader's 9 is
the Ace. Here’s an exception to playing third hand high. East
should keep a “cover card” – the Ace honor over dummy’s
Queen. In addition to keeping the important cover card,
West can deduce that East has the Jack and 10. Now let’s
investigate third hand play when leader has a strong honor
sequence.
J 3 2
K Q 10 5 4 A 6
9 8 7
West leads the King, the top of a broken sequence
(recall we should lead the top of the touching honors). In third
seat, East should play the Ace and return the suit. If
East played the 6, West will certainly play again; this
would force East to play the Ace, blocking the suit – a
most unfortunate situation. Next, let’s examine a situation
where third hand uses a ducking strategy to belatedly promote a
suit (opponents are playing a Notrump contract).
3 2
10 4 A K Q 6 5
J 9 8 7
Imagine East bid this suit, South overcalled Notrump and the
opponents eventually ended up in 3 Notrump. After West dutifully
leads the 10, should East win the trick and continue
playing the suit? The answer is, “it depends!” If East has an
outside entry, then going up with the top honor will work – East
loses the fourth trick to South’s Jack but later wins a
trick in an outside suit and cashes the fourth trick in this
suit to set the contract. But what about the situation where
West has the only winner in an outside suit? If East were to win
the Ace-King-Queen and East later gets in the lead, West
would not be able to return a card to East’s promoted suit. We
call this keeping the suit communication open. In essence, when
the long hand does not have an outside entry, be careful to
disrupt the vital suit communication channel. Finally, let’s
explore a ducking maneuver where the opponents are in a suit
contract and partner is hoping to gain a ruff.
J 8 6
9 2 A 10 7 5 4
K Q 3
West leads the 9; should East play third hand high
with the Ace? Again, the answer depends on who has an
outside suit entry. If East has an outside Ace of trump,
it would be okay to win the Ace here and return a low
card in the suit – when the declarer wins the trick and plays a
trump, East wins and plays a third card in this suit to give
West a ruff. However, if West potentially held the Ace
of trump or King-third “behind” the declarer, than
clearly East should not win the first trick. As we saw before,
when West regains the lead and returns the remaining singleton
in the opening suit, East wins the Ace and gives West a
well-deserved trump ruff.
In summary, third hand high is a useful axiom yet it does not
absolve the player from thoughtful play based on the big picture
- and that’s what makes our delightful game of Bridge so much
fun! Two good books covering third hand high (or not) are: “Defense”
(formerly known as the Heart Series) and “25
Bridge Myths Exposed.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hope you are enjoying the BridgeHands website and eMag Newsletters.
As always, we look forward to hearing from you with your comments and
suggestions.
Best wishes,
BridgeHands
phone: 707-769-4499
|
|
|
|